Application 17/392,895
Abandoned -- Failure to Respond to an Office ActionDermatological preparations for maintaining and/or restoring healthy skin microbiota
Art Unit 1651·Examiner GOUGH, TIFFANY MAUREEN·Filed Aug 3, 2021·Status since Aug 20, 2025
Applicant Yun NV·Inventor Sarah Lebeer et al.
The latest Office Action
Mailed Dec 17, 2024 · Final Office Action · response window has passed
The examiner maintains that all pending claims are obvious under §103. Obviousness means the examiner believes a person skilled in the art could have arrived at the claimed invention by combining teachings from existing patents. Two separate rejection theories are presented: one combines Lang, KR20120089530A, Nonaka, and Henn; the other combines EP2149368, KR20120089530A, and Henn. Both theories assert that these prior patents, taken together, teach or suggest all elements of the claims directed to dermatological preparations for maintaining healthy skin microbiota.
A response is due within three months from December 17, 2024, extendable to six months with fees. Because this is Final, options are more limited than after a Non-Final action. The applicant can file a response with arguments and/or claim amendments (though amendments after Final may require showing of good and sufficient reasons), request an examiner interview to discuss claim scope, file a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) with amendments to restart prosecution, or appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. An attorney typically handles this; if you'd like patentreply.ai to draft a response, click 'Get this drafted'.
Compiled case file available
This application's complete prosecution record has been compiled by PatentReply — every office action, response, claim version, and cited reference, verified against the USPTO file wrapper.
- Office actions
- 4
- Pending claims
- 16